-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[kubernetes] want to increase number of workers in k8s #33567
Comments
Today you only can increase using the env variable. Some other users had created some external applications to auto scale based on the number of pods. The best path is to use cron and calculate the number of workers you'll need. |
@marcosmarxm Thanks for reply. At the moment, we are running jobs 4 hours once and nightly jobs hence, it would be great if we can increase /decrease the workers based on total number of jobs (running + pending). is there a blog or document which you can refer to me ? |
At Airbyte, we seek to be clear about the project priorities and roadmap. This issue has not had any activity for 180 days, suggesting that it's not as critical as others. It's possible it has already been fixed. It is being marked as stale and will be closed in 20 days if there is no activity. To keep it open, please comment to let us know why it is important to you and if it is still reproducible on recent versions of Airbyte. |
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 20 days since being marked as stale. |
Platform Version
0.50.34
What step the error happened?
None
Revelant information
Job is failing due to "Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Integer.intValue()" because the return value of "io.airbyte.workers.process.KubePortManagerSingleton.take()" is null"
Is there a way to increase worker based on number of jobs pending in k8s. Please provide me pointer to do the same.
I have tried CPU/Memory metrics but, no luck.
Relevant log output
similar to this
https://community.temporal.io/t/suggested-metrics-to-autoscale-temporal-workers-on/5870/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: