Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Glossary renderer is unaware of version (Markdown or PDF) #2069

Open
oesteban opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2083
Open

[BUG] Glossary renderer is unaware of version (Markdown or PDF) #2069

oesteban opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2083
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@oesteban
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe your problem in detail.

As a result, #1781 will introduce a bug that hides the Description field in glossary terms having one (e.g., common principles).

Before #1781, the parsing of newlines in the description preempts any sophistication beyond paragraphs.

Describe what you expected.

Both versions render properly.

BIDS specification section

https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[MAINT] use jinja in the macros Remi-Gau/bids-specification
1 participant
@oesteban