@@ -3,29 +3,26 @@ RFC: 0000
3
3
Author : Steve Lee
4
4
Status : Draft
5
5
Area : Process
6
- Version : 1.1
6
+ Version : 1.2
7
7
Feedback : https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-Language-RFC/issues/5
8
8
---
9
9
10
10
# PowerShell RFC Process and Guidelines
11
11
12
- A PowerShell RFC (Request for Comments) is a publication to propose
13
- design changes and improvements to PowerShell. This provides the community an opportunity
14
- to provide feedback before code is written where it becomes harder to change at the risk of
15
- compatibility. The complete list of RFCs are available at
16
- https://github.com/powershell/powershell-rfc
12
+ A PowerShell RFC (Request for Comments) is a publication to propose design changes and improvements to PowerShell.
13
+ This provides the community an opportunity to provide feedback before code is written where it becomes harder to change at the risk of
14
+ compatibility.
15
+ The complete list of RFCs are available at https://github.com/powershell/powershell-rfc
17
16
18
- This process was adapted from the Chef RFC process as well as from DMTF.org process
17
+ This process was adapted from the Chef RFC process as well as from DMTF.org process.
19
18
20
19
## Roles
21
20
22
- Currently, only members of the PowerShell Core team are allowed to author
23
- new RFCs. All members of the community can provide feedback to any RFC.
21
+ All members of the community are allowed to author new RFCs and can provide feedback to any RFC.
24
22
25
23
## RFC Naming Convention
26
24
27
- RFC documents shall follow the naming convention of "RFC####-Title.md" where #### is
28
- the RFC number and Title is the title of the document.
25
+ RFC documents shall follow the naming convention of "RFC####-Title.md" where #### is the RFC number and Title is the title of the document.
29
26
30
27
## RFC Template
31
28
@@ -62,34 +59,34 @@ RFCs go through applicable stages:
62
59
63
60
* Draft
64
61
65
- This is the initial draft of a RFC posted for comments and considered a
66
- work-in-progress. Typically, two months is allowed for comments.
62
+ This is the initial draft of a RFC posted for comments and considered a work-in-progress.
63
+ Typically, two months is allowed for comments.
67
64
68
65
* Draft-Accepted
69
66
70
- Comments have been reviewed and new comments are not being sought. Code
71
- work has not started/planned or not needed.
67
+ Comments have been reviewed and new comments are not being sought.
68
+ Code work has not started/planned or not needed.
72
69
73
70
* Experimental
74
71
75
- Comments have been reviewed and code is being written to provide an working
76
- example of the proposed design change to get further feedback.
72
+ Comments have been reviewed and code is being written to provide an working example of the proposed design change to get further feedback.
77
73
78
74
* Experimental-Accepted
79
75
80
76
Feedback from the experimental implementation and RFC have been reviewed.
81
- Engineering team will work towards final implementation in code to match
82
- the RFC.
77
+ Engineering team will work towards final implementation in code to match the RFC.
83
78
84
79
* Rejected
85
80
86
81
Based on community feedback, this RFC was decided to not proceed any further.
87
82
88
83
* Final
89
84
90
- Design and implementation is considered complete. Any proposed changes
91
- would be through a new RFC.
85
+ Design and implementation is considered complete.
86
+ Any proposed changes would be through a new RFC.
92
87
93
- ---
94
- History:
95
- v1.1 - 5-20-2016 - Updated to enable RFCs for design changes that don't require code changes. Added Draft-Accepted state and Version header property.
88
+ ## History
89
+ v1.1 - 5-20-2016 - Updated to enable RFCs for design changes that don't require code changes.
90
+ Added Draft-Accepted state and Version header property.
91
+
92
+ v1.2 - 8-18-2016 - Open submitting RFCs to the community and update formatting.
0 commit comments