✅ Deploy Preview for ethereumorg ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d12cd32
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/ethereumorg/deploys/67d4631812ea970008860e55
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-15054--ethereumorg.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	7 paths audited Performance: 45 (🔴 down 12 from production) Accessibility: 95 (🟢 up 1 from production) Best Practices: 87 (🔴 down 8 from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 59 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Hi @JoeChenJ! Question: If user selects one persona, can the other personas counter be recalculated based on how many are available with "and" logic?

in this example i selected "deggen", and then it shows there are 7 hardware wallets, which isnt true. There are only 4 wallets that include both "degen" tag and "hardware" tag

Hi @JoeChenJ! Question: If user selects one persona, can the other personas counter be recalculated based on how many are available with "and" logic?

in this example i selected "deggen", and then it shows there are 7 hardware wallets, which isnt true. There are only 4 wallets that include both "degen" tag and "hardware" tag

No problem! Just did a commit to improve the logic

this padding on mobile 1.5 rem -> 0.75 please

@JoeChenJ lastly could you please put back "finance" instead of "degen" ? sorry for having it in figma, I should probably think through that naming more before proposing a change.

did some final testing with a user to see if the dark mode is visible enough and there is a small concern the outline isnt clear enough. Potential suggestion is to add glow behind the cards like on homepage.

this message can be removed

Used the shadow like on home page, thanks for the feedbacks! 🚀 @konopkja

looks awesome! thanks for all edits and patience with me :D, last thing i noticed the glow is cut at the bottom probably bcs of container?

good catch! Yes I should add some padding to the container

lgtm! ty again so much for your contribution

found a bug on some screen sizes.

maybe fixed height?

one more very small visual bug

Can we add some space between the top filter and the other filter?

@konopkja this is not a bug, but what do you think about making this a list and not a 2 by 2 grid?

or it's better like because of mobile affordance 🧐

one more very small visual bug

Can we add some space between the top filter and the other filter?

@konopkja this is not a bug, but what do you think about making this a list and not a 2 by 2 grid?

or it's better like because of mobile affordance 🧐

yeah i think we can keep it 2x2 , but some padding at the bottom is a good idea, good catch!