Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPIC - Introduce new API Specs and infra creation flow #1611

Closed
9 tasks done
Prajyot-Parab opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
9 tasks done

EPIC - Introduce new API Specs and infra creation flow #1611

Prajyot-Parab opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Milestone

Comments

@Prajyot-Parab
Copy link
Contributor

Prajyot-Parab commented Feb 9, 2024

/kind feature
/area provider/ibmcloud

Describe the solution you'd like
This epic covers all the task items involved as part of the process to complete the entire PowerVS infra creation via CAPIBM.

Completed

TO-DO

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider labels Feb 9, 2024
@Prajyot-Parab
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @Karthik-K-N @Amulyam24 @Prajyot-Parab

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

Karthik-K-N commented Apr 3, 2024

Some of the review comments which needs to be addressed

@mkumatag mkumatag modified the milestones: v0.8, Next May 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 15, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 15, 2024
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Sep 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 16, 2024
@mkumatag
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 17, 2024
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

Some of the review comments which needs to be addressed

* [x]  Have proper resource state handling and avoid returning error
  PR: [Avoid returning error when resource creation and deletion is in progress #1693](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1693)* [x]  Revisit logs messages
    
    * [Refactor logging #1755](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1755)[ ]  reconcileNetwork - reconcile DHCP server and network separately[ ]  Check about how to test in staging environment as machine types are different[ ]  Fix gocyclo measure and avoid //nollint* [x]  Reconcile VPC - separate the security group from it and handle it outside
    
    * [Support VPC security group for PowerVS clusters #1738](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1738)* [x]  Check on how to use and handle exisitng TG and connections
    
    * [Attach connections to existing transit gateway when its not there #1901](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1901)* [Refactor transit gateway status #1961](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1961)[ ]  Revisit when the IBMPowerVSMachine should be set as ready after updating Machine IP in LB and all operations are done or before[ ]  Rewrite LB pool memeber addition -- revisit the logic, it looks complicated* [x]  Optmise checking and setting status for resources
    
    * [Refactor reconcilation of resources #1937](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1937)[ ]  Have defined types for recurring errors
  - [Improve IBMPowerVSCluster deletion #1825](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1825)[x]  Validate a case when invalid ID is passed while getting a resource — check how API behaves
  - [Refactor reconcilation of resources #1937](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1937)[ ]  optimise LB pool member creation[ ]  Add a check before importing or using IBMPowerVSImage and execute only if IBMPowerVSCluster is ready[ ]  How to handle if machine has multiple internal IPs[ ]  Revisit adding/setting/updating listeners in LB creation

Uncompleted items in this list will be completed as part of #2129
hence closing this issue
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Some of the review comments which needs to be addressed

* [x]  Have proper resource state handling and avoid returning error
  PR: [Avoid returning error when resource creation and deletion is in progress #1693](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1693)* [x]  Revisit logs messages
    
    * [Refactor logging #1755](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1755)[ ]  reconcileNetwork - reconcile DHCP server and network separately[ ]  Check about how to test in staging environment as machine types are different[ ]  Fix gocyclo measure and avoid //nollint* [x]  Reconcile VPC - separate the security group from it and handle it outside
    
    * [Support VPC security group for PowerVS clusters #1738](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1738)* [x]  Check on how to use and handle exisitng TG and connections
    
    * [Attach connections to existing transit gateway when its not there #1901](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1901)* [Refactor transit gateway status #1961](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1961)[ ]  Revisit when the IBMPowerVSMachine should be set as ready after updating Machine IP in LB and all operations are done or before[ ]  Rewrite LB pool memeber addition -- revisit the logic, it looks complicated* [x]  Optmise checking and setting status for resources
    
    * [Refactor reconcilation of resources #1937](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1937)[ ]  Have defined types for recurring errors
  - [Improve IBMPowerVSCluster deletion #1825](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1825)[x]  Validate a case when invalid ID is passed while getting a resource — check how API behaves
  - [Refactor reconcilation of resources #1937](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/pull/1937)[ ]  optimise LB pool member creation[ ]  Add a check before importing or using IBMPowerVSImage and execute only if IBMPowerVSCluster is ready[ ]  How to handle if machine has multiple internal IPs[ ]  Revisit adding/setting/updating listeners in LB creation

Uncompleted items in this list will be completed as part of #2129
hence closing this issue
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants