Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[minor] indentation misalignment on interfaces page when LICARS theme enabled #3303

Open
mwoolweaver opened this issue Mar 8, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@mwoolweaver
Copy link

Versions

Core
Version is v6.0.5-13-g387ec3a3 (Latest: null)
Branch is development
Hash is 387ec3a3 (Latest: 387ec3a3)
Web
Version is v6.0.2-40-g3f193926 (Latest: null)
Branch is development
Hash is 3f19392 (Latest: 3f19392)
FTL
Version is vDev-464b2df (Latest: null)
Branch is development
Hash is 464b2dfc (Latest: 464b2dfc)

Platform

  • OS and version: Ubuntu 24.04.2
  • Platform: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.1

Expected behavior

indentation alignment on interfaces page when LICARS theme enabled should be the same as it does with other themes

Actual behavior / bug

it seems that there was a small misalignment of the 3rd drop down, items under are slightly further left than with other themes

Steps to reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Enable LICARS
  2. Go to https://pi.hole/admin/interfaces
  3. expand drop down arrows to show individual addresses
  4. See small misalignment of information listed under address

as seen in chrome
Image

as seen in firefox
Image

Debug Token

Screenshots

If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@rdwebdesign
Copy link
Member

This padding is set by the third party plugin bstreeview and the font used by LCARS theme has a slightly different spacing.

This will be hard to fix only using CSS, but I can try. Also, I think I will wait for the other PR (to change the current SVG icons to use "fontawesome" font) because maybe this will change the alignment again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants