Remove Log4j API 3.x #2325
Closed
Remove Log4j API 3.x #2325
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In order for Log4j Core 3.x not to depend on the utility classes in Log4j API 2.x, we provide a new `AbstractLogger` in `log4j-sdk`.
After some minor corrections flow message methods are also immediately inlineable.
9 tasks
ppkarwasz
force-pushed
the
fix/rollback-log4j-api
branch
from
42a76d2 to
a7c3282
Compare
ppkarwasz
force-pushed
the
fix/rollback-log4j-api
branch
from
a7c3282 to
72d1120
Compare
|
Before merging this, we need to remove |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR closes #2290.
This is a long-term goal. Currently this draft replaces some parts of
log4j-apiandlog4j-api-testto their 2.x versions. Ultimately thelog4j-apiandlog4j-api-testmodules will be removed altogether.This task also requires for the
log4j-to-slf4jmodule to be rolled back to its 2.x version. The only differences between the two version are the use ofRecyclerversusThreadLocal.