-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: MambaInstall plugin #8515
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? Admins can comment |
02854ea
to
fe96c0b
Compare
feat: MambaInstall plugin feat: MambaInstall plugin feat: MambaInstall plugin feat: MambaInstall plugin
fe96c0b
to
40e5c88
Compare
ok to test from my perspective. Nit: sorry I initially missed the section on code formatting |
Unit Test ResultsSee test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests. 27 files ± 0 27 suites ±0 10h 0m 35s ⏱️ - 9m 3s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 40e5c88. ± Comparison against base commit b03efee. |
Just realised that the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for taking the time to raise this.
Given that libmamba
is now the default conda solver it sort of feels like mamba
will gradually disappear. Especially given the mamba
devs are now focused on pixi
.
What benefit does this plugin give over the existing CondaInstall
with modern versions of conda
?
Thanks I didn't fully appreciate those changes. I quickly tested CondaInstall and MambaInstall, and they perform quite similarly indeed! The only use case would be for setups that do have |
Enables the use of both Mamba and Micromamba for package installation, offering flexibility depending on user preference or environment constraints.
Mamba accelerates package installation and dependency resolution compared to Conda.