-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: search cache invalidation for iceberg entities #12805
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
5b8dcc3
to
8a9e06e
Compare
8a9e06e
to
60bcda1
Compare
60bcda1
to
615dfc0
Compare
} | ||
|
||
private Set<Object> getKeys(String cacheName) { | ||
// Enumerating cache keys is not part of the standard Cache interface, but needs is native cache |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is unfortunate but I don't see any alternative either.
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ graphService: | |||
searchService: | |||
resultBatchSize: ${SEARCH_SERVICE_BATCH_SIZE:100} | |||
enableCache: ${SEARCH_SERVICE_ENABLE_CACHE:false} | |||
enableEviction: ${SEARCH_SERVICE_ENABLE_CACHE_EVICTION:false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once included in a release, we'll want to update our helm chart to support enabling it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, stamping assuming test coverage is met for merging.
615dfc0
to
b31f1f5
Compare
Checklist